Frankly Speaking: We’ve got so much to catch up on!

Standard

Women in cafe talking-285x290

 

“It feels like forever since we’ve had a chance to catch up!” How many of us have said something similar repeatedly in the last few weeks and months? So many of the disconnects stem from “two weeks to flatten the curve” expanding beyond anyone’s expectations (are you talking about COVID or your waistline?). My sense of time passage is so distorted that I regularly find myself asking, “has it really been more than two years since…?”   

There’s been no disconnect in the pipeline of new and revised employment laws and regulations (I see what you did there). Here are a few of the highlights (don’t you mean lowlights?) employers need to know about:

Employee Notice of Employer Electronic Monitoring

Please don’t skip over this one because you don’t think it applies to your business! Essentially all software and business services provided for employee use – including phones, email, and Internet access – allow employers to monitor or otherwise intercept electronic communications,  transmissions, or internet access or usage. So, if you provide anything more than pencils to your employees, this applies to your business.

This amendment to the NY State Civil Rights Laws mandates that private employers in the state notify employees that “any and all telephone conversations or transmissions, electronic mail or transmissions, or internet access or usage by an employee by any electronic device or system including, but not limited to, the use of a computer, telephone, wire, radio or electromagnetic, photoelectronic or photo-optical systems may be subject to monitoring at any and all times and by any lawful means.” (Who writes this stuff?!)

What does that mean for employers? As NY State employer mandates go, this one isn’t too bad (is that supposed to be comforting?). Here’s what employers must do by May 7, 2022, the statute’s effective date:

  • Provide all employees with a written notice containing the italicized language above;
  • Require all employees to sign and return a written acknowledgment form – many legal experts are strongly suggesting the acknowledgment form also include the statute’s language;
  • Post a copy of the same written notice in a conspicuous workplace location – preferably with other required employment posters – and/or on the company intranet where it is accessible to all employees;
  • Update the company’s electronic monitoring and IT policies contained in the employee handbook; and
  • Revise new employee onboarding processes to provide the written electronic monitoring notice and receive a signed acknowledgment before a new employee is subject to any electronic monitoring.    

Employers should also note four additional points: (i) the law appears to require notification to all employees, regardless of whether they are physically located in NY State, (ii) this is an annual notice and acknowledgment requirement (I wouldn’t expect anything less), (iii) each failure to properly notify an individual employee is a separate violation, and (iv) penalties of $500 for the first offense, $1,000 for the second offense, and $3,000 for the third and each subsequent offense.

Amendments to the NY Paid Family Leave Law

As most employers are aware, under the NY Paid Family Leave Law (“PFLL”), eligible employees are allowed up to 12 weeks of paid family leave over a 52-week period. Until recently, when an employee used PLF leave intermittently, the maximum amount of leave was capped at 60 days. This cap assumed the employee worked, at most, a five-day workweek, i.e., five days per week for 12 weeks equals 60 days of leave. However, the NY State Workers’ Compensation Board amended the PFL regulations to eliminate the 60-day cap.

Effective January 1, 2022, the maximum number of intermittent leave days an employee may take is based on the average number of days the employee works per week during the measurement period. For example, an employee working an average of six days per week is now entitled to 72 days of intermittent leave – and an average of seven days per week equals 84 days of intermittent leave – over a 52-week period. Also, this amendment is applied prospectively for claims filed on or after the effective date.

While we’re on the topic of PFL, effective January 1, 2023, the current list of covered family members – the employee’s spouse, domestic partner, children, stepchildren, parents, stepparents, parents-in-law, grandparents, and grandchildren – will expand to include the employee’s biological, adopted, step-, and half-siblings.

Updates to the NY State Human Rights Law Regarding Workplace Sexual Harassment

The significant number of sexual harassment complaints raised against Andrew Cuomo once again put the spotlight on how employers handle allegations of inappropriate workplace behaviors. Effective March 16, 2022, an amendment to the NY State Human Rights Law (“HRL”) modified the definition of “unlawful retaliation” to include “disclosing an employee’s personnel files because he or she has opposed any practices forbidden under [the HRL] or because he or she has filed a complaint, testified, or assisted in any proceeding.” However, the amendment still allows employers to disclose personnel information “where such release is necessary to respond to a complaint, civil or criminal action, or judicial or administrative proceeding.”

Another amendment to the State’s HRL requires the NY State Division of Human Rights (“DHR”) to establish a confidential sexual harassment complaint hotline. Expected to be operational by July 14, 2022, the hotline will be staffed by “attorneys experienced in providing counsel related to sexual harassment matters who can provide pro bono assistance and counsel to individuals [who] contact the hotline.” Although the DHR is yet to issue compliance guidance, the amendment does require employers to post information about the hotline in the workplace (they can’t post what they don’t have!).  

NY State Mandates Retirement Savings Plans for All Employees

In an effort to “promote greater retirement savings for private-sector employees in a convenient, automatic, low-cost, and portable manner,” NY State has enacted legislation establishing the Secure Choice Savings Program (“Secure Choice IRA”). The legislation also requires “certain private-sector employers” to automatically enroll employees 18 years of age and older in the Secure Choice IRA program and deposit the employee’s after-tax contributions into a Roth individual retirement account.

For purposes of the Secure Choice IRA program, the state defines “certain private-sector employers” as any “person or entity engaged in a business, industry, profession, trade, or other enterprise in New York State” – including not-for-profit organizations – that has:

  • At all times during the prior calendar year [without interruption], employed at least 10 employees in the state;
  • Been in business for at least two years; and
  • Not offered a qualified retirement plan, including, but not limited to, a plan qualified under sections 401(a), 401(k), 403(a), 403(b), 408(k), 408(p), or 457(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, in the preceding two years.

Although the law requires their automatic enrollment in the Secure Choice IRA program, employees have the right to:

  • Participate in the Secure Choice IRA program and select the contribution level, expressed as a percentage of wages or as a dollar amount up to the applicable annual limit;
  • Change their contribution level at any time, subject to rules established by the state’s Secure Choice Savings Board (“Board”);
  • Take their IRA with them if and when they change jobs; and
  • Affirmatively elect to opt-out of the Secure Choice IRA program using the appropriate opt-out form.

Where an employee fails to select a contribution level, or affirmatively opt-out of participation, the employer is required to automatically enroll the employee at the three percent default contribution rate.

No employer contributions are made to Secure Choice IRAs. Also, employers are prohibited from terminating an existing qualified plan to participate in the Secure Choice IRA program.

Lastly (a sweeter word has never been written), there is no need for employers to take any immediate action (you couldn’t have started with that little tidbit?). The state’s Secure Choice Savings Board, which is responsible for administration and operation, has up to two years to implement the program. Then, once the Board opens the program, employers will have nine months to begin enrolling employees and comply with the program’s requirements. Although no firm date has been set, the Board held its first meeting in late January, and many experts believe the program will be up and running no later than December 31, 2022.


If you have questions about compliance with state and federal regulations and mandates, or want information on any of the services HR Compliance Experts offers, call us at 585-565-3900 or email theexperts@hrcexperts.com.

Did you enjoyed Frankly Speaking? Then let us know at theexperts@hrcexperts.com! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2022 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

Frankly Speaking: Did NY Gov. Hochul end workplace mask requirements for most employees, or NOT?

Standard

EEs removing masks-sm2

Before you send me the angry email you’re composing in your head, let me explain (oh, go ahead, send him an angry email just for fun!).
 
As you already know, under one of NY Gov. Hochul’s previous orders, face coverings (just call them masks, face coverings sounds creepy) were required to be worn by employees, customers, and visitors in all indoor public places – including offices – unless proof of vaccination was required for entry. Then, yesterday Gov. Hochul announced the order would expire today, February 10, 2022. So now, most businesses, with certain exceptions, will no longer need to ensure that customers and visitors are masked. 
 
Many employers and employees celebrated the announcement (I have a feeling you’re going to ruin it for them), but something about the announcement bothered me. Then, it hit me (I hope it hurt!). The so-called “indoor mask mandate” that was about to expire and the NY HERO Act – which requires all employees to wear masks in the workplace – are two separate things! Why does that matter (you took the question right out of my head)? Because the HERO Act requirements are in effect until at least February 15, 2022.
 
On September 6, 2021, the NY commissioner of health designated COVID-19 as “a highly contagious communicable disease that presents a serious risk of harm to the public health in New York State.” That action triggered the HERO Act required all employers to implement their Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plans (you just triggered a cramp in my brain). Among the Act’s requirements was that every employer mandate all employees wear masks in the workplace – regardless of individual vaccination status – unless everyone on-site, not just employees, was fully vaccinated. Furthermore, unless addressed beforehand, employees would be required to continue wearing masks until at least February 15, 2022! 
 
Now, the Good News! NY updated the language in its HERO Act model plan as follows: 
  • EFFECTIVE FEBRUARY 10, 2022 Employees will wear appropriate face coverings in accordance with guidance from the State Department of Health or the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as applicable. Consistent with the guidance from the State Department of Health, if indoor areas do not have a mask or vaccine requirement as a condition of entry, appropriate face coverings are recommended but not required. It is also recommended that face coverings be worn by unvaccinated individuals, including those with medical exemptions, in accordance with federal CDC guidance. Further, the State’s masking requirements continue to be in effect for pre-K to grade 12 schools, public transit, homeless shelters, domestic violence shelters, correctional facilities, nursing homes, health care, child care, group homes, and other sensitive settings in accordance with CDC guidelines. New York State and the State Department of Health continue to strongly recommend face coverings in all public indoor settings as an added layer of protection, even when not required.
Employers should note that the acting commissioner of health may extend COVID’s designation as a highly contagious communicable disease beyond February 15, 2022. And, yes, that means employers may be required to keep their Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plans in effect. But, with this change in the model policy language, most employers now have the option of whether to require employees to wear masks at work.  

If you have questions about compliance with state and federal regulations and mandates, or want information on any of the services HR Compliance Experts offers, call us at 585-565-3900 or email theexperts@hrcexperts.com.

Did you enjoyed Frankly Speaking? Then let us know at theexperts@hrcexperts.com! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2022 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

HRCE Compliance Update: NYS HERO Act Designation and Mask Mandate Extended

Standard

Two face masks 1-sm

The New York State Commissioner of Health once again extended the designation of COVID-19 as highly contagious, which requires employers’ HERO Act safety plans to remain activated through at least February 15, 2022. The Commissioner also extended the State’s mask mandate through February 1, 2022.

With the State’s recent surge of COVID-19 cases, overwhelmingly due to the Omicron variant, the Commissioner’s actions were not unexpected. A decision is expected by February 15, 2022, on whether, based on the level of COVID-19 transmission rates at the time, to extend the designation beyond that date.

Employers in NYS must continue enforcing their company’s Disease Exposure Prevention Plan under the HERO Act. This includes, among other requirements, conducting daily health screenings and mandatory masking in workplaces unless all individuals are fully vaccinated.

Separately but related, based on the NYS Health Commissioner’s revised Determination on Indoor Masking, the State’s mask mandate is extended through at least February 1, 2022. Under this mandate, masks are required for employees, customers, and visitors in all indoor public places – including offices – unless the business or venue requires proof of vaccination to enter.

Although the HERO Act designation and the mask mandate now have different expiration dates, they effectively share the same employee masking requirements. Therefore, regardless of the mask mandate’s current February 1, 2022, expiration date, employers should expect to continue employee masking requirements under the HERO Act through at least February 15, 2022.


If you have questions about compliance with state and federal regulations and mandates, or want information on any of the services HR Compliance Experts offers, call us at 585-565-3900 or email HRAnswers@hrcexperts.com.

Was this HRCE Compliance Update helpful? Then let us know at HRAnswers@hrcexperts.com  Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact us at HRAnswers@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.
 
Posted by members of the HR Compliance Experts team.

© 2022 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about HR Compliance Experts LLC.

Who’s on First? NYS and the CDC on the Same Page…For Today!

Standard

whos_on_first

One of my favorite childhood memories is of watching the slapstick comedy team forever known as Abbott and Costello (I knew you were old, but wow!). While definitely from a different era and not politically correct by today’s standards, Abbott and Costello were comedy geniuses. But, of all their work, “Who’s on First” is likely their best-known skit. It also perfectly represents what happens when I try to explain most state and federal COVID-19 regulations and guidance.     

In case you haven’t heard, the New York State Department of Health (“NYDOH”) updated its December 24, 2021, Advisory on Shortening Isolation Period for Certain Fully Vaccinated Healthcare Workers and Other Critical Workforce guidance document. This guidance, Interim Updated Isolation and Quarantine Guidance, is intended to clarify several points (how can you write the words “clarify” and government “guidance” without falling off your chair laughing?) and adopts recommendations from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (“CDC”) issued in a press release titled, CDC Updates and Shortens Recommended Isolation and Quarantine Period for General Population. (OK, enough with the links to government documents that nobody understands…including the government!)

Without creating an Ishikawa diagram (a what?! Never mind, I’m sure I wouldn’t understand it.), the following bullet points should help explain the most recent guidance:

  • NYS is now aligned with the updated CDC recommendations, which allow for shortened isolation and quarantine requirements for the general population.

The NYS Interim Guidance makes the following recommendations regarding isolation:

  • An individual exhibiting symptoms of COVID-19 must isolate for five days – where day zero is the day symptoms first began.
  • An asymptomatic individual who tests positive for COVID-19 must also isolate for five days – where day zero is the day the individual took the first COVID-19 test with a positive result.
  • Isolation will end following the five-day isolation period if the individual is asymptomatic or if symptoms are resolving. The individual must then wear a well-fitting mask (KN95 is recommended) while in the presence of others for an additional five days.
  • Individuals who are unable to wear a well-fitting mask (KN95 is recommended) following the five-day isolation period must follow standard (i.e., not shortened) Isolation Guidance.
  • Individuals who are moderately to severely immunocompromised should also continue to follow standard (i.e., not shortened) Isolation Guidance.

The NYS Interim Guidance provides further recommendations regarding quarantine for individuals who were exposed to COVID-19, where day zero is the last date of exposure:

  • An individual NOT fully vaccinated must quarantine for five days; then, they must wear a well-fitting mask (KN95 is recommended) while in the presence of others for an additional five days.
  • Likewise, a fully vaccinated individual eligible for, but who has not yet received a booster (or received a booster less than two weeks before the first date of exposure), must quarantine for five days; then, must wear a well-fitting mask (KN95 is recommended) while in the presence of others for an additional five days.
  • A fully vaccinated individual who received a booster at least two weeks before the first date of exposure is not required to quarantine. However, the individual must wear a well-fitting mask (KN95 is recommended) while in the presence of others for 10 days after the last date of exposure.
  • A fully vaccinated individual not yet eligible for a booster is not required to quarantine. However, the individual must wear a well-fitting mask (KN95 is recommended) while in the presence of others for 10 days after the last date of exposure.
  • If possible, the individual should test for COVID-19 with either a Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (i.e., PCR) or Antigen Test on day five of the isolation period.
  • If symptoms appear, the individual must quarantine and should test for COVID-19. In this situation, the quarantine will end when the test is negative. If the individual does not test for COVID-19, they must isolate according to the guidance above.

Wait, There is More!

While I have your attention, I’d like to share some of the FAQs we’ve received from our clients through our HR Answerline.

Q: Please clarify COVID-specific sick pay requirements for employers and who is eligible.

A: NYS requires employers to provide employees with job-protected COVID-specific sick pay based on the following:

  • Small businesses with 10 or fewer employees and a net annual income less than $1 million in the previous year:
    • Must provide employees with unpaid leave for the duration of their quarantine or isolation period.  
    • Employees on unpaid leave may receive COVID-specific benefits through the employer’s Paid Family Leave and disability benefits policy for the duration of the order of quarantine or isolation.
  • Small businesses with 10 or fewer employees and a net annual income of $1 million or more in the previous year, and:
  • Medium-sized businesses with 11-99 employees: 
    • Must provide employees with at least five days of COVID-specific paid sick leave.
    • Employees may receive COVID-specific benefits through the employer’s Paid Family Leave and disability benefits policy following the five days of COVID-specific sick leave.  
  • Large businesses with 100 or more employees: 
    • Must provide employees with at least 14 days of COVID-specific paid sick leave. 
    • Employees may receive COVID-specific benefits through the employer’s Paid Family Leave and disability benefits policy following the 14 days of COVID-specific sick leave.

Q: Are employees who continue to test positive for COVID-19 at the end of a COVID-19 Order period eligible for additional periods of mandatory NYS COVID-19 quarantine paid leave?

A: Employees who continue to test positive for COVID-19 at the end of a mandatory order of quarantine or isolation are “deemed” to be subject to a second mandatory order of quarantine and are immediately eligible for another period of COVID-19 quarantine paid leave.

Q: Are employees not subject to COVID-19 orders but required to remain out of work by their employer due to a confirmed or potential exposure to COVID-19, eligible for COVID-19 quarantine paid leave?

A: Yes, but with a twist. Employees not subject to mandatory orders of quarantine or isolation but told by their employer to remain out of work due to a potential or confirmed exposure to COVID-19 must continue to be paid their regular wages until either:

  • The employer allows the employee to return to work; or
  • The employee is subject to a COVID-19 order, at which time the employee will receive COVID-19 quarantine paid leave for the remainder of the order.

Q: Is there a limit on the number of times an employer must provide employees with COVID-19 quarantine paid leave?

A: Yes. Employees are limited to a total of three periods of COVID-19 quarantine paid leave. However, to be eligible for the second and third periods of paid leave, employees must first test positive for COVID- 19.

Q: Is NYS COVID-specific paid leave the same as the annual NYS Paid Sick and Safe Leave employers are required to provide employees?

A: NO. NYS Paid COVID-specific leave is separate from the mandated annual Paid Sick and Safe Leave (“PSSL”) benefit employers must provide employees. Further, employers are prohibited from requiring employees to use any available PSSL or deducting from an employee’s available PSSL for COVID-related absences.

Q: How do we pay commissioned employees?

A: COVID-specific sick pay for employees usually paid on a commission basis is the same as any other paid leave benefits they would otherwise receive. For example, if a commissioned salesperson is paid $150 per day when on vacation or other paid leave, they would likewise receive $150 per day for COVID-specific paid leave. Note, the employee cannot be paid less than minimum wage. For example, if an employee generally works eight hours per day, they must receive at least $105.60 (8 x $13.20 per hour) in most areas of NYS. Certain fast-food employees and employees in NYC and Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties must be paid at least $120.00 (8 x $15.00 per hour).

Q: Is an employee eligible for COVID-specific pay if their child has tested positive?

A: COVID-specific sick pay is not required unless the employee has a covered COVID event. However, if the employee’s minor dependent child is under a mandatory or precautionary order of quarantine or isolation, the employee may be eligible to take Paid Family Leave (“PFL”) to care for them. This benefit is not available if the employee is able to work through remote access or other means. In 2022, the PFL wage benefit for COVID-19 quarantine leave is 67% of the employee’s average weekly wage (AWW), up to a maximum weekly benefit of $840.70. The AWW is the average of the employee’s pay for eight weeks in which they worked and received wages prior to starting PFL.

That’s all for now (why such a short post…NOT!). But, stay tuned for updates on the federal “Vaccine or Test” mandate, and any other issues that are sure to cause additional confusion for us all!   


If you have questions about compliance with state and federal regulations and mandates, or want information on any of the services HR Compliance Experts offers, call us at 585-565-3900 or email theexperts@hrcexperts.com.

Did you enjoyed Frankly Speaking? Then let us know at theexperts@hrcexperts.com! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2022 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

The OSHA COVID-19 Vaccine-or-Test Order Is On Again…But Will It Stay On?

Standard

COVID Vaccine sign

As you likely know, late Friday, December 17, 2021, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit issued a 2-1 decision lifting the stay on the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standard (“ETS”). This action, which allows OSHA to move forward with implementing the ETS, removed the stay previously issued by the Fifth Circuit. (Is this going to be another long boring article about stuff nobody but you understands or cares about?) However, immediately following the Six Circuit’s decision, it was appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who handles all emergency appeals for the Sixth Circuit, subsequently ordered the Biden Administration to file its briefs on the matter by 4:00 pm on December 30, 2021 (you should read one of your articles to your grandchildren as a bedtime story, it’s guaranteed to put them right to sleep!). With that timeline, it’s unlikely we’ll have any decision until after January 1, 2022.

In the meantime, employers with 100 or more employees should prepare to implement the OSHA COVID-19 ETS in their workplaces. A good starting point is; OSHA’s ETS FAQs. OSHA stated that it will not issue citations for non-compliance with any requirements of the ETS before January 10, 2022. Further, OSHA will not issue citations for non-compliance with the ETS testing requirements before February 9, 2022, as long as the employer exercises reasonable, good faith compliance efforts. To help support that they’ve demonstrated good faith compliance efforts, employers should: 

  • Notify all employees of the ETS requirements—as a condition of employment, they will need to get vaccinated or be required to test weekly.
  • Survey employees on their vaccination status, including a request for proof of vaccination, and record their vaccinated or unvaccinated status in a spreadsheet or other roster. The ETS further requires employers to maintain this documentation, including copies of each employee’s proof of vaccination, and record any employee who refuses to respond or provide proof of vaccination as unvaccinated.
  • Provide paid time off for employees to get the COVID-19 vaccine and/or to recover from effects of the vaccine.
  • Develop and implement a COVID-19 policy that requires employees be fully vaccinated against COVID-19 or, for unvaccinated employees, weekly testing. The policy must also state that unvaccinated employees must wear a mask in the workplace  and while with other employees in a vehicle or when together for work-related purposes. The policy must also include protocols for screening non-employees entering the workplace.
  • Enforce necessary quarantine periods for employees who test positive for COVID-19.
  • Where testing will be used as an option, begin procuring tests and/or exploring local options for testing that may be used and begin implementing the testing option on or before February 9, 2022.

This is a complex mandate (wow, King of the understatements on this one!) with an exhaustive list of questions – many not yet thought of – and don’t forget about the intersections with state and local laws and regulations (how could we!). My team and I will continue to monitor the situation over the coming days and weeks and will keep you updated along the way. So, buckle up and get ready for bumpy sleigh ride!

On behalf of everyone at HR Compliance Experts (and me, Frank’s snarky alter ego), we wish you a safe and happy holiday season and a Happy New Year!


If you have questions about compliance with state and federal regulations and mandates, or any of the services HR Compliance Experts offers, contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Did you enjoyed Frankly Speaking? Then let us know at theexperts@hrcexperts.com! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2021 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

Frankly Speaking – Gifts to NY Employers Just Keep Coming!

Standard

Santa with List

If you didn’t know this announcement was coming, I have a large box of masks made by Oregon Gov. Kate Brown I’ll sell you at a great price. (Santa said to stop picking on Gov. Brown or you’re going on the “naughty” list, one of the elves thinks her mask is really cool.) In addition to their incredibly generous gift of a mask mandate just in time for the holidays, NY Gov. Kathy Hochul and NY Commissioner of Health, Dr. Mary Bassett, again extended COVID’s “highly contagious” designation through at least January 15, 2022. That means employers must keep their HERO Act safety plans in place and active through at least January 15, 2022 as well. 

As I previously wrote about in July, September, and October (I think you need to find something else to write about), the NY HERO Act is intended “to protect employees against exposure and disease during a future airborne infectious disease outbreak,” and is activated when the state’s health commissioner designates, in this case, COVID-19 as a highly contagious communicable disease that presents a serious risk of harm to the public health. First activated on September 6, 2021, the HERO Act’s “activated” status has been extended for the third time, now through January 15, 2022. With that extension, employers must continue measures such as daily health screenings for all employees.

Further, Gov. Hochul’s mask mandate, effective December 13, 2021, requires all employees, customers, and visitors in all indoor public places—including office buildings and spaces—to wear a mask at all times, with very limited exceptions, unless the covered business or venue requires proof of vaccination from everyone before they enter. (How’s that working out so far?) Lastly, (you promise?) whether by design or coincidence (my money is on dumb luck), both the most recent extension of the HERO Act and the mask mandate are effective through January 15, 2022. I’m sure I can get another box of masks from Gov. Brown, so let me know  you want to wager on whether they’ll be extended.  


If you have questions about compliance with state and federal regulations and mandates, or any of the services HR Compliance Experts offers, contact us at hranswers@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Did you enjoyed Frankly Speaking? Then let us know at theexperts@hrcexperts.com! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact us at hranswers@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2021 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

OSHA Issues Long-Awaited COVID-19 Vaccine-or-Test Order

Standard

Man being vaccinated-sm

There’s just no end to the COVID news over the last few days!

 This morning, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) released its long-awaited COVID-19 Emergency Temporary Standard (“ETS”). This ETS is in response to President Biden’s call for employers with 100 or more employees to require their employees to be vaccinated against COVID-19 or wear a mask and submit to COVID-19 testing at least weekly.

 In addition, the White House announced the following:

  • All unvaccinated workers must begin wearing masks by December 5, 2021, and provide proof of a negative COVID-19 test at least weekly beginning January 4, 2022.
  • The deadline for federal contractors to comply with similar provisions of the President’s Executive Order (“EO”) 14042 has been pushed out to January 4, 2022.
  • Employers are not required to pay for or provide COVID-19 tests for their employees unless required under state or local laws or as part of a collective bargaining agreement.

With this announcement, my team and I recommend that covered employers review their COVID-19 workplace policies – i.e., NY employers’ NYS HERO Act, Section 1, workplace safety plans – and make the appropriate updates by the deadlines set forth in the ETS. Further, we recommend employers check with their health insurance plan providers to determine if the cost of mandated weekly testing is covered or if it will be an out-of-pocket expense for employees. Lastly, employers should prepare to have difficult conversations with employees about this often heated and emotional topic.   

Of course, there will be legal challenges to this federal mandate. However, as with so many other laws, rules, and regulations, employers should plan for full compliance and adjust those plans as necessary along the way.

This is a complex mandate with countless questions – many not yet thought of – and intersections with state and local laws and regulations. We’ll be doing our research over the coming days and weeks and will keep you updated along the way. So, buckle up and get ready for another bumpy ride!


If you have questions about compliance with state and federal regulations and mandates, or any of the services HR Compliance Experts offers, contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Did you enjoyed Frankly Speaking? Then let us know at theexperts@hrcexperts.com! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2021 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

Frankly Speaking – NYS HERO Act has Employers Asking Again, WTH?

Standard

man making time out sign-sm

In my July 13, 2021 post, “NYS HERO Act has Employers Asking, WTH?” (I said it then, and I’ll say it again, there’s no “O” word, you need an “O” word if the acronym is HERO!), I wrote about Section 1 of the Act. At that time, most employers were aware of the requirement to adopt a safety and health plan by August 5, 2021, and distribute their plan to all employees within 30 days. Then, on September 6, 2021, COVID-19 was designated a serious public health risk under the HERO Act. As a result, employers were ordered to implement their plans (if this post gets any drier, the words will blow off the screen) and keep them in effect until at least October 31, 2021. BTW, the state has not indicated whether that designation will be extended.  UPDATE: The NYS Commissioner of Health has extended the the designation of COVID-19 as a serious health threat until December 15, 2021. Therefore, employer safety and health plans must remain in effect through at least December 15, 2021.  

That brings us to November 1, 2021, when Section 2 of the HERO Act goes into effect. Section 2 requires employers with 10 or more employees to allow employees to create a joint labor-management workplace safety committee (that sounds very union-like to me). Although similar committees are typical in a unionized environment, Section 2 applies to all employers covered by the HERO Act.

Like a toddler promising to pick up their toys before dinnertime, the NYS Department of Labor (“NYS DOL”) committed to providing updated employer guidance on Section 2 before Monday, November 1, 2021. Unfortunately, once again, it appears the toddler’s promise is more likely to be honored. (Come on, be fair, they still have one more day – Sunday – to release the guidance.) So, for now, I can at least explain some of the basics:

  • At the request of one or more of its employees, an employer of 10 or more must allow employees to establish and administer a joint labor-management workplace safety committee.
  • The term “employees,” as it relates to Section 2, is defined as all employees in the state of New York, except employees of the state, any political subdivision of the state, a public authority, or any other governmental agency (of course NYS doesn’t include itself in these things!).
  • The committee must include both employer and employee representatives, with at least two-thirds being non-supervisory employees.
  • The employee members of the committee must be chosen by and from the employer’s non-supervisory employees. The employer is prohibited from interfering with the selection of non-supervisory employees to serve on the committee.
  • Further, the committee must be co-chaired by a representative of the non-supervisory employees and an employer representative.
  • Section 2 also authorizes the creation of multiple committees representing geographically distinct worksites.

Under Section 2 of the HERO Act, workplace safety committees have authorization to:

  1. Raise health and safety concerns, hazards, complaints, and violations to the employer, to which the employer must respond;
  2. Review and provide feedback on any workplace health and safety policy required by the HERO Act or the workers’ compensation law; 
  3. Review the adoption of any workplace policy in response to any health or safety law, ordinance, rule, regulation, executive order, or other related directives; 
  4. Participate in any site visit by any governmental entity responsible for enforcing safety and health standards; 
  5. Review any report filed by the employer related to the health and safety of the workplace; and 
  6. Hold a scheduled meeting during work hours, at least once per quarter.

The employer must also permit and pay safety committee designees to attend training on the function of worker safety committees, rights established under Section 2 of the HERO Act, and an introduction to occupational safety and health.

Unionized employers should note that different requirements apply if a collective bargaining agreement (“CBA”) is in place. Under a CBA, the collective bargaining representative will be responsible for selecting employees to serve as members of the committee. In addition, provisions of Section 2 may be waived by a CBA that explicitly references the section.

Like Section 1 of the HERO Act, Section 2 contains anti-retaliation provisions. These include, among other points, prohibiting the employer from retaliating against any employee who participates in the establishment or activities of a workplace safety committee. Violations of the anti-retaliation provision may result in penalties, including:

  1. Assessment of civil penalties of $1,000 to $10,000;
  2. Injunctive (legal) relief; 
  3. Liquidated damages of up to $20,000; 
  4. Payment of costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees to the employee; 
  5. An order to rehire or reinstate the employee to their former position, with the restoration of seniority, or an award of lost compensation, damages, and front pay in place of reinstatement.

Finally, one bright spot, an employer with an existing safety committee that meets the HERO Act’s requirements is not required to create an additional committee (wow, you really stretched to find that “bright spot!”).

Based on my experience working with small and mid-sized businesses, most are likely unfamiliar with joint employee/employer workplace committees of any type. Given that unfamiliarity, the complexity of the rules, and the significant financial penalties associated with noncompliance, preparation is critical to correctly responding when employees request to establish a workplace safety committee. Therefore, employers should work with an HR compliance expert (I’m sure any subliminal reference to your consulting firm, HR Compliance Experts, was purely coincidental and not a shameless plug) or their employment attorney when faced with employee requests to establish a workplace safety committee.      


If you have questions about compliance with state and federal regulations and mandates, or any of the services HR Compliance Experts offers, contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Did you enjoyed Frankly Speaking? Then let us know at theexperts@hrcexperts.com! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2021 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

Frankly Speaking – Are You Suffering From Employer Mandate Whiplash?

Standard

Woman with neck brace

Did anyone else see this coming? [Maybe you should identify what “this” is before asking if anyone saw it coming.] Last month I wrote about the New York State Health and Essential Rights (“HERO”) Act in a previous post, and specifically, the Act’s mandate that all employers create and distribute an Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plan (the “Plan”) to employees. So, admittedly, I didn’t expect we would need to implement those plans less than a month later. But that’s not the only recent announcement that took many of us off guard. President Biden also dropped a big one on us last week! Let me explain [please!].  

HERO Act Plan Activation

While most of us were enjoying our last hot dogs of the summer on Labor Day, NY’s new chief executive, Gov. Kathy Hochul, directed the state’s Commissioner of Health to designate COVID-19 as a “highly contagious communicable disease that presents a serious risk of harm to the public health.” Now, with that designation made, employers are compelled to take immediate action [OK, you’ve got my attention].

NY State now requires every employer to:

  • Immediately review and update their Plan to ensure it incorporates current information, guidance, and mandatory requirements issued by federal, state, or local governments related to COVID-19;
  • Finalize and promptly implement or “activate” their HERO Act Plan;
  • Provide all employees with a verbal review on the specifics of the Plan;
  • Provide each employee with a copy of the Plan; and
  • Post a copy of your Plan in a “visible and prominent location” available to employees on all shifts.

Did you catch the third bullet point about providing “all employees with a verbal review on the specifics of the Plan?” [What the heck is that about?] Based on my discussions with a few attorneys, and confirmed by a representative from NY State, it means verbally explaining the Company’s Plan to your employees. [What?! You’re joking, right?] As part of the activation process, employers must provide employees with training – whether live, recorded, video-based, etc. – on the specific actions called for in the Company’s Plan. But that’s not all [of course not].

With the activation of the HERO Act plans, employers have continuing obligations to ensure their Plan is being effectively followed in the workplace. The State requires all employers to: 

  • Designate one or more supervisory employees to enforce compliance with the Plan;
  • Monitor and maintain the Company’s workplace exposure controls;
  • Regularly check for updated information and guidance provided by the NY State Department of Health, the Centers for Disease Control, and other federal, state, or local government entities as it pertains to COVID-19; and
  • Update their Plan to reflect any changes in the exposure control measures recommended by these entities.

Here’s the best part [do I detect a hint of sarcasm?], the designation of COVID-19 as a highly contagious communicable disease expires on September 30, 2021, unless ordered to continue by the NY State Commissioner of Health. [I wonder what the over/under is in Vegas?]

Hot Off the Press! NY State recently updated its HERO Act FAQs to provide some clarification on employer requirements. Here are a few highlights:

Q: Is an employer required to explain the plan to its employees?

A: Yes. A verbal review of the plan with all employees must be conducted, except need not be provided to individuals working for staffing agencies, contractors and subcontractors, or individuals delivering goods or transporting people to or from the worksite. A verbal review of the plan must also be conducted when a highly contagious communicable disease is designated by the Commissioner of Health as presenting a serious risk of harm to public health.

Q: What is meant by “verbal review”?

A: Employers must conduct a verbal review of the infectious disease exposure protection plan with their employees, but such review is not required to be in person. Employers should conduct the verbal review in a manner most suitable for the prevention of an airborne infectious disease, including via audio or video conference technology when applicable.  

Q: Will the Department of Labor be publishing HERO Act regulations?

A: Yes, the Department of Labor will be promulgating regulations for the HERO Act in accordance with the State Administrative Procedure Act.

Q: What enforcement mechanisms exist to address violations of the law?

A: Employers may be subject to daily penalties of $50 and violations ranging up to $10,000 for failure to abide by the plan’s requirements. 

Speaking of Employee Vaccination Mandates

On Thursday, September 9, 2021, President Biden announced a six-pronged, “comprehensive national strategy” to combat COVID-19. [Hey, weren’t you quoted in the Washington Examiner about this?] The President outlined, among other things:

  1. His direction to the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) to issue an Emergency Temporary Standard (“ETS”) requiring employers with 100 or more employees to mandate COVID-19 vaccinations, or (b) weekly testing for their workforce;
  2. The requirement that those employers provide paid time off to employees to get vaccinated and recover from any adverse effects;
  3. A COVID-19 vaccination mandate for all federal employees and contractors, without a testing option or a religious exemption; and
  4. The requirement that healthcare employers ensure their employees are fully vaccinated to receive Medicare or Medicaid reimbursements.

As is often the case with these announcements, there are far more questions than answers. However, here are a few things to consider while waiting for the ETS and DOL guidance:

Q: What should employers do if they haven’t implemented a mandatory vaccination policy?

A: While the Biden administration would like employers to act based on the announced vaccination/testing mandate framework, employers are not required to take any action now. However, if employers have not implemented a mandatory vaccination/testing policy, it may be an excellent time to begin discussions in preparation for the expected mandate.  

Q: When will OSHA issue the mandatory vaccination/testing ETS, and will covered employers be required to comply immediately?

A: Neither the federal Department of Labor (“DOL”) nor OSHA has provided a firm timeline, but early indications are that the ETS may be issued as quickly as the next four to six weeks. Employers should then have 30 to 60 days to implement the rule.    

Q: How much paid time off will employers be required to provide when employees get vaccinated and to recover from any side effects?

A: This one is a little more complicated [I hate complicated!]. Remember, the NY Covid-19 Vaccine Leave Law covers all employers in NY State. Under this law, all public and private sector employers must provide employees with up to four hours of paid time off at their regular wage rate, per injection, when getting a COVID-19 vaccination. So, unless the federal mandate is greater than the NY mandate, employers will continue to follow state law regarding PTO for COVID-19 vaccinations. Also, NY State currently requires employers to allow employees to use accrued paid sick leave available to them under the State’s Paid Safe and Sick Leave law (“PSSL”) to recover from any side effects caused by the COVID-19 vaccination. Now the complicated part [No! I’m already confused!]. According to the Administration’s announced plans, the ETS will also make PTO mandatory for recovery from COVID-19 vaccination side effects but has not indicated that employers will be allowed to require the use of existing PTO or sick time. Or, if the use of PTO or sick time is allowed, how will employees with no available PTO or sick time be paid?

Q: Who will be responsible for the cost of weekly COVID-19 testing, and will employers be required to pay employees for the time it takes for testing?    

A: More great questions with no real answers. [So, in other words, you have no freaking clue.] The Biden Administration indicates that they will expand the current number of retail pharmacy sites offering free COVID-19 testing to 10,000 pharmacies.  However, where free testing may not be readily available, the rules are in some cases situational, and in others, murky at best. Employers should also consider the potential for employee relations issues if employees, already frustrated and angry with the mandate, learn they are required to pay for weekly COVID-19 testing.

Whether employers must pay employees for the time necessary for weekly testing under a federal mandate is also unclear. If done during the employee’s worktime, the time spent testing is considered “time worked” and is compensable. Otherwise, it may depend mainly on the degree of control the employer has over the “when, where, and how” of the testing. Further, according to the DOL, the time spent being tested is likely compensable when testing “is integral and indispensable to (the employee’s) work during the pandemic.”

Confused? With no concrete details on what to expect from the upcoming ETS, we’re all living in the state of confusion. [I see what you did there…funny guy.] A lot can and likely will change between now and the time OSHA publishes the ETS. Stay tuned!


If you have questions about compliance with state and federal regulations and mandates, or any of the services HR Compliance Experts offers, contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Did you enjoyed Frankly Speaking? Then let us know at theexperts@hrcexperts.com! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2021 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

Frankly Speaking – Please don’t kiss anyone goodbye!

Standard

ACkissing handAs we recently learned, Andrew Cuomo resigned his position as Governor of New York State. Although I started writing this post before Gov. Cuomo’s announcement, it still provides valuable insights into workplace sexual harassment.

Over the last few days, I’ve spent several hours reading and rereading the Report of Investigation into Allegations of Sexual Harassment by Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, and his response contained in the Position Statement of Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Concerning the Sexual Harassment Allegations Made Against Him. [Are you serious? Just the titles are longer than anything I want to read about a politician. You need a life!] These documents are fascinating to me [right, you and about five other people] from a professional perspective because I’ve spent more than a decade conducting workplace investigations. My work has spanned a broad spectrum of alleged behaviors and individuals in both the public and private sectors. I’ve conducted investigations in multiple states, and, acting as a subject matter expert, I’ve reviewed and provided feedback on investigations conducted by internal HR departments and attorneys. [OK, we get it, you’re well known, busy, and boring…what’s your point?]. With that somewhat unique perspective, I feel compelled to share some thoughts, not only on the specific documents and circumstances involving Gov. Cuomo, but also the broader points and take-aways from the situation.    

Like the individual at the center of this issue, I’m a slightly past middle-aged white male and proud of my Italian heritage. [Fortunately, that’s where the comparison ends!] I’ve also been critical of some of Gov. Cuomo’s decisions and policies. So, for objectivity and to help the reader see the broader scope [and hopefully stay awake], I’ve changed the scenario from one concerning Andrew Cuomo to one involving a family business owner in NY. Finally, please remember that the use of humor does not mean the issues are taken lightly.

Background

In 2018, Gov. Cuomo signed legislation requiring all employers, including the state, to provide annual interactive sexual harassment prevention training to all employees, including documented proof of attendance. Then, in August 2019, Gov. Cuomo signed additional legislation that further strengthened the state’s laws against sexual harassment, including:

  • Amending the definition of an “employer” to include all employers in the state, including the state and its political subdivisions, regardless of size.
  • Lowering the burden of proof for harassment claims from the federal standard – actions that ”would be considered severe or pervasive” – to actions that rise above “what a reasonable victim of discrimination with the same protected characteristic would consider petty slights or trivial inconveniences.”
  • Further defining unlawful harassment to include any activity that “subjects an individual to inferior terms, conditions or privileges of employment because of the individual’s membership in one or more of these protected categories,” and
  • Extending the statute of limitations to file a sexual harassment complaint with the NY State Division of Human Rights (“DHR”) from one year to three years. 

Also, the state’s definition of sexual harassment includes “any unwanted verbal or physical advances, sexually explicit derogatory statements or sexually discriminatory remarks made by someone which are offensive or objectionable to the recipient, which cause the recipient discomfort or humiliation, [or] which interfere with the recipient’s job performance.”

Everybody loves a Cannoli, right?

Anthony Cannoli, CEO of Cannoli’s Cannolis!, and his family are well-known in the community. Anthony’s father founded and was the CEO of Cannoli’s Cannolis! for several years. Then, after a series of CEOs from outside the family, Anthony Cannoli stepped in and has run the family business for more than a decade. Fans and foes alike generally agree that Anthony Cannoli is proud of all he and his family have accomplished, and especially his Italian heritage. 

Earlier this year, 11 women alleged Anthony Cannoli sexually harassed them. Included were nine current or former employees and two women who alleged Cannoli touched them inappropriately at separate events he attended.

There were also hostile work environment allegations describing the culture of the Cannoli’s Cannolis! office as rife with fear and intimidation, “extremely toxic, extremely abusive.” Getting “yelled at in front of everyone” was commonplace, and the culture “was controlled largely by [Anthony Cannoli’s] temper, and he was surrounded by people who enabled his behavior.” Mr. Cannoli “makes all this inappropriate and creepy behavior normal like you should not complain,” and he knew “he could get away with it because of the fear that he knew we had.” “Everyone knows he’s very vindictive.”

Cannoli’s attorney rebutted that “his leadership style is results-oriented.” His “high expectations for his staff are the same irrespective of gender,” and that “the pressure and demands of that environment are not for everyone.” Further, Mr. Cannoli admits “he is informal with his staff and banters with all employees…” and compares his actions to those of Senator Chuck Schumer, who allegedly “describes his staff as ‘family,’ enjoys teasing [employees] about their relationship status and encourages them to get married and have kids.”

Clearly, Mr. Cannoli believes his actions were misunderstood and misrepresented by the complainants.

Cannolis are Italian!

Well-aware of the NY human rights laws regarding sexual harassment, Cannoli vehemently denied some of the allegations while admitting to many others, generally with one caveat or another:

  • No offense was intended.
  • She “processed what she heard through her own filter” (referring to a complainant he knew was a sexual assault survivor).  
  • “On occasion, I do slip and say sweetheart, or darling, or honey,” so-called terms of endearment he used because he’s “old fashioned.”

Here’s where, as an Italian, I start to hit my forehead with the palm of my hand. Anthony Cannoli recorded a video in which he attempted to discredit claims of inappropriate touching by focusing on his self-described lifelong gesture of touching, holding, and kissing people’s faces:

  • “I’ve been making the same gesture in public all my life.”
  • “I actually learned it from my mother (roll picture of Mama Cannoli touching his face), and my father (now roll Papa Cannoli doing the same).”
  • “It’s meant to convey warmth, nothing more.”
  • “There are hundreds, if not thousands, of photos of me using the exact same gesture.”
  • “I do it with everyone (roll photo montage of Cannoli holding and kissing the faces of children and adults from all walks of life, including famous people and political leaders), Black and White, young and old, straight and LGBTQ, powerful people, friends, strangers, people I meet on the street.”
  • In response to an allegation that he kissed an employee on the forehead at the office Christmas party and said Ciao Bella (hello beautiful), “I don’t remember doing it, but I’m sure that I did.”
  • “I do kiss people on the forehead. (Roll photo montage showing Cannoli doing what he describes.) I do kiss people on the cheek. I do kiss people on the hand. [OK, I’ve tried to keep quiet to this point, but the woman whose hand he’s kissing looks like she wants to punch him. Probably should have skipped that one!] I do embrace people. I do hug people – men and women.”

To that last point about hugging people, in response to one of the complaints of inappropriate touching, Cannoli told the investigators that the woman was the “initiator of the hugs,” while he was “more in the reciprocal business.” [What does that even mean?] But he “would go along” with the tight hugs because he didn’t “want to make anyone feel awkward about anything.”  

No more Cannoli

I hope you enjoyed the analogy of Anthony Cannoli. But since Andrew Cuomo resigned, I want to get back to his voice. In Gov. Cuomo’s lead-up to announcing his resignation, in one breath, he claimed, “I take full responsibility for my actions.” Then, in the next, he again attempted to excuse his behaviors. “I do hug and kiss people casually – women and men. I have done it all my life. It’s who I’ve been since I can remember.” [Heard it all before.] However, what came next was the most telling: “In my mind, I’ve never crossed the line with anyone. But I didn’t realize the extent to which the line has been redrawn.” [Wait, what? Did he seriously say that?] “There are generational and cultural shifts that I just didn’t fully appreciate. And I should have.”

Governor, it’s difficult for me to believe you weren’t acutely aware of the generational and cultural shifts. Those shifts appear to be, in large part, the basis for recent changes you made to the state’s human rights laws. [HE’S LITERALLY THE ONE WHO RE-DREW THE LINE!] Remember when you called the federal “severe or pervasive” standard for harassment claims “absurd” and lowered the burden of proof in NY State to behaviors beyond “petty slights or trivial inconveniences?” It’s part of the sexual harassment prevention training you mandated every employee receive annually. [I think he was busy that day. I read his assistant took the training for him and signed his name on the acknowledgment form.]

Surely, I’m not the first person to mention that, as an employer, all that needs to be shown is that you “knew or should have known” your behaviors were beyond “petty slights or trivial inconveniences.” [State and federal agencies love the “knew or should have known” concept!] Also, don’t forget about the mountain of case law showing the courts repeatedly rejecting “the notion that a harasser’s innocent intent will defeat liability.” Your “I’m Italian” defense won’t go far. Check out Carosella v. U.S. Postal Service (1987). In his defense against sexual harassment charges, Patrick Carosella stated, “I’m an Italian; I have a bad habit of maybe grabbing people…whether it’s a female or male.” [Spoiler Alert: He lost!] I’m guessing your “I’m old fashioned” and “I’ve been doing it my entire life” defenses would be equally ineffective.

Mr. Cuomo, I agree, there have been, and there will continue to be, significant generational and cultural shifts in our lifetime. Yes, I recognize them because it’s my responsibility as a business owner with employees and clients, and as an HR professional [isn’t it kinda his job too?]. But most importantly, I recognize them because I’m a son, brother, husband, father, grandfather, friend, and human being who respects the dignity of the people around me. As especially my daughter is fond of pointing out, I’m not perfect in this, or any area of my life. But I make no excuses and try to get a little better every day. I hope you will learn to do the same.  


If you have questions about workplace harassment, or want information on the Sexual Harassment Prevention Training options or any of the services HR Compliance Experts offers, contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Did you enjoyed Frankly Speaking? Then let us know at theexperts@hrcexperts.com! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2021 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.