Frankly Speaking – Please don’t kiss anyone goodbye!

Standard

ACkissing handAs we recently learned, Andrew Cuomo resigned his position as Governor of New York State. Although I started writing this post before Gov. Cuomo’s announcement, it still provides valuable insights into workplace sexual harassment.

Over the last few days, I’ve spent several hours reading and rereading the Report of Investigation into Allegations of Sexual Harassment by Governor Andrew M. Cuomo, and his response contained in the Position Statement of Governor Andrew M. Cuomo Concerning the Sexual Harassment Allegations Made Against Him. [Are you serious? Just the titles are longer than anything I want to read about a politician. You need a life!] These documents are fascinating to me [right, you and about five other people] from a professional perspective because I’ve spent more than a decade conducting workplace investigations. My work has spanned a broad spectrum of alleged behaviors and individuals in both the public and private sectors. I’ve conducted investigations in multiple states, and, acting as a subject matter expert, I’ve reviewed and provided feedback on investigations conducted by internal HR departments and attorneys. [OK, we get it, you’re well known, busy, and boring…what’s your point?]. With that somewhat unique perspective, I feel compelled to share some thoughts, not only on the specific documents and circumstances involving Gov. Cuomo, but also the broader points and take-aways from the situation.    

Like the individual at the center of this issue, I’m a slightly past middle-aged white male and proud of my Italian heritage. [Fortunately, that’s where the comparison ends!] I’ve also been critical of some of Gov. Cuomo’s decisions and policies. So, for objectivity and to help the reader see the broader scope [and hopefully stay awake], I’ve changed the scenario from one concerning Andrew Cuomo to one involving a family business owner in NY. Finally, please remember that the use of humor does not mean the issues are taken lightly.

Background

In 2018, Gov. Cuomo signed legislation requiring all employers, including the state, to provide annual interactive sexual harassment prevention training to all employees, including documented proof of attendance. Then, in August 2019, Gov. Cuomo signed additional legislation that further strengthened the state’s laws against sexual harassment, including:

  • Amending the definition of an “employer” to include all employers in the state, including the state and its political subdivisions, regardless of size.
  • Lowering the burden of proof for harassment claims from the federal standard – actions that ”would be considered severe or pervasive” – to actions that rise above “what a reasonable victim of discrimination with the same protected characteristic would consider petty slights or trivial inconveniences.”
  • Further defining unlawful harassment to include any activity that “subjects an individual to inferior terms, conditions or privileges of employment because of the individual’s membership in one or more of these protected categories,” and
  • Extending the statute of limitations to file a sexual harassment complaint with the NY State Division of Human Rights (“DHR”) from one year to three years. 

Also, the state’s definition of sexual harassment includes “any unwanted verbal or physical advances, sexually explicit derogatory statements or sexually discriminatory remarks made by someone which are offensive or objectionable to the recipient, which cause the recipient discomfort or humiliation, [or] which interfere with the recipient’s job performance.”

Everybody loves a Cannoli, right?

Anthony Cannoli, CEO of Cannoli’s Cannolis!, and his family are well-known in the community. Anthony’s father founded and was the CEO of Cannoli’s Cannolis! for several years. Then, after a series of CEOs from outside the family, Anthony Cannoli stepped in and has run the family business for more than a decade. Fans and foes alike generally agree that Anthony Cannoli is proud of all he and his family have accomplished, and especially his Italian heritage. 

Earlier this year, 11 women alleged Anthony Cannoli sexually harassed them. Included were nine current or former employees and two women who alleged Cannoli touched them inappropriately at separate events he attended.

There were also hostile work environment allegations describing the culture of the Cannoli’s Cannolis! office as rife with fear and intimidation, “extremely toxic, extremely abusive.” Getting “yelled at in front of everyone” was commonplace, and the culture “was controlled largely by [Anthony Cannoli’s] temper, and he was surrounded by people who enabled his behavior.” Mr. Cannoli “makes all this inappropriate and creepy behavior normal like you should not complain,” and he knew “he could get away with it because of the fear that he knew we had.” “Everyone knows he’s very vindictive.”

Cannoli’s attorney rebutted that “his leadership style is results-oriented.” His “high expectations for his staff are the same irrespective of gender,” and that “the pressure and demands of that environment are not for everyone.” Further, Mr. Cannoli admits “he is informal with his staff and banters with all employees…” and compares his actions to those of Senator Chuck Schumer, who allegedly “describes his staff as ‘family,’ enjoys teasing [employees] about their relationship status and encourages them to get married and have kids.”

Clearly, Mr. Cannoli believes his actions were misunderstood and misrepresented by the complainants.

Cannolis are Italian!

Well-aware of the NY human rights laws regarding sexual harassment, Cannoli vehemently denied some of the allegations while admitting to many others, generally with one caveat or another:

  • No offense was intended.
  • She “processed what she heard through her own filter” (referring to a complainant he knew was a sexual assault survivor).  
  • “On occasion, I do slip and say sweetheart, or darling, or honey,” so-called terms of endearment he used because he’s “old fashioned.”

Here’s where, as an Italian, I start to hit my forehead with the palm of my hand. Anthony Cannoli recorded a video in which he attempted to discredit claims of inappropriate touching by focusing on his self-described lifelong gesture of touching, holding, and kissing people’s faces:

  • “I’ve been making the same gesture in public all my life.”
  • “I actually learned it from my mother (roll picture of Mama Cannoli touching his face), and my father (now roll Papa Cannoli doing the same).”
  • “It’s meant to convey warmth, nothing more.”
  • “There are hundreds, if not thousands, of photos of me using the exact same gesture.”
  • “I do it with everyone (roll photo montage of Cannoli holding and kissing the faces of children and adults from all walks of life, including famous people and political leaders), Black and White, young and old, straight and LGBTQ, powerful people, friends, strangers, people I meet on the street.”
  • In response to an allegation that he kissed an employee on the forehead at the office Christmas party and said Ciao Bella (hello beautiful), “I don’t remember doing it, but I’m sure that I did.”
  • “I do kiss people on the forehead. (Roll photo montage showing Cannoli doing what he describes.) I do kiss people on the cheek. I do kiss people on the hand. [OK, I’ve tried to keep quiet to this point, but the woman whose hand he’s kissing looks like she wants to punch him. Probably should have skipped that one!] I do embrace people. I do hug people – men and women.”

To that last point about hugging people, in response to one of the complaints of inappropriate touching, Cannoli told the investigators that the woman was the “initiator of the hugs,” while he was “more in the reciprocal business.” [What does that even mean?] But he “would go along” with the tight hugs because he didn’t “want to make anyone feel awkward about anything.”  

No more Cannoli

I hope you enjoyed the analogy of Anthony Cannoli. But since Andrew Cuomo resigned, I want to get back to his voice. In Gov. Cuomo’s lead-up to announcing his resignation, in one breath, he claimed, “I take full responsibility for my actions.” Then, in the next, he again attempted to excuse his behaviors. “I do hug and kiss people casually – women and men. I have done it all my life. It’s who I’ve been since I can remember.” [Heard it all before.] However, what came next was the most telling: “In my mind, I’ve never crossed the line with anyone. But I didn’t realize the extent to which the line has been redrawn.” [Wait, what? Did he seriously say that?] “There are generational and cultural shifts that I just didn’t fully appreciate. And I should have.”

Governor, it’s difficult for me to believe you weren’t acutely aware of the generational and cultural shifts. Those shifts appear to be, in large part, the basis for recent changes you made to the state’s human rights laws. [HE’S LITERALLY THE ONE WHO RE-DREW THE LINE!] Remember when you called the federal “severe or pervasive” standard for harassment claims “absurd” and lowered the burden of proof in NY State to behaviors beyond “petty slights or trivial inconveniences?” It’s part of the sexual harassment prevention training you mandated every employee receive annually. [I think he was busy that day. I read his assistant took the training for him and signed his name on the acknowledgment form.]

Surely, I’m not the first person to mention that, as an employer, all that needs to be shown is that you “knew or should have known” your behaviors were beyond “petty slights or trivial inconveniences.” [State and federal agencies love the “knew or should have known” concept!] Also, don’t forget about the mountain of case law showing the courts repeatedly rejecting “the notion that a harasser’s innocent intent will defeat liability.” Your “I’m Italian” defense won’t go far. Check out Carosella v. U.S. Postal Service (1987). In his defense against sexual harassment charges, Patrick Carosella stated, “I’m an Italian; I have a bad habit of maybe grabbing people…whether it’s a female or male.” [Spoiler Alert: He lost!] I’m guessing your “I’m old fashioned” and “I’ve been doing it my entire life” defenses would be equally ineffective.

Mr. Cuomo, I agree, there have been, and there will continue to be, significant generational and cultural shifts in our lifetime. Yes, I recognize them because it’s my responsibility as a business owner with employees and clients, and as an HR professional [isn’t it kinda his job too?]. But most importantly, I recognize them because I’m a son, brother, husband, father, grandfather, friend, and human being who respects the dignity of the people around me. As especially my daughter is fond of pointing out, I’m not perfect in this, or any area of my life. But I make no excuses and try to get a little better every day. I hope you will learn to do the same.  


If you have questions about workplace harassment, or want information on the Sexual Harassment Prevention Training options or any of the services HR Compliance Experts offers, contact us at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Did you enjoyed Frankly Speaking? Then let us know at theexperts@hrcexperts.com! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact at theexperts@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-565-3900.

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2021 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

Frankly Speaking – NYS HERO Act has employers asking, “WTH?”

Standard

Babe Ruth2Is anyone else tired of legislative acronyms? (Yes, and I can’t wait to see how you manage to connect legislative acronyms to Babe Ruth.) Almost no one, including the legislators, know what they stand for. Especially when the acronyms are ridiculously overused, like SAFE, CARE, FAIR, STOP, HELP, HOPE…well, you get the idea.

Some of the classics I found:

  • Robo COP Act – Robo Calls Off Phones Act;
  • FLY Act – Financial Literacy for Youth Act;
  • End GREED Act – End Government Reimbursement of Excessive Executive Disbursements Act;
  • APPLE Juice Act – Arsenic Prevention and Protection from Lead Exposure in Juice Act; and my favorite,
  • BABE RUTH Act – Build America Bonds Extension for Rural and Urban Transportation and Highways Act, which obviously has nothing to do with baseball. (That’s why you have a picture of The Babe…overplayed, but clever.)

Never ones to let go of a bad thing, New York lawmakers recently passed a novel, sweeping overhaul of the State’s workplace health and safety laws. The HERO Act – Health and Essential Rights Act (wait, I think you forgot something…there’s no “O” word, you need an “O” word if the acronym is HERO), is intended to “to protect employees against exposure and disease during a future airborne infectious disease outbreak.

Among other things, the HERO Act (again, without an “O” word, it’s the HER Act) instructed the New York State Department of Labor (“NYSDOL”) to create written model airborne infectious disease exposure prevention standards to cover workplaces throughout NY. Specifically, the NYSDOL was tasked with creating separate model standards for, (1) industries representing a significant portion of the workforce, or those with unique characteristics requiring distinct standards, and (2) all remaining worksites not included in the specific industry standards.

The model standards, published July 7, 2021, are important for several reasons. Chief among them is that all employers in NY State – regardless of size, industry, or location – have 30 calendar days from that date to establish an airborne infectious disease exposure plan. With the clock ticking, and the August 6, 2021, deadline fast approaching, employers have an important choice to make: (1) commit the time, effort, and financial resources necessary to create and implement their own airborne infectious disease exposure plan that meets or exceeds the State’s minimum standards; or (2) adopt the appropriate industry-specific Model Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plan published by the NYSDOL.

For employers like me who think this is one of the easiest decisions they’ve had to make all year, the specific industries covered are: agriculture, construction, delivery services, domestic workers, emergency response, food services, manufacturing and industry, personal services, private education, private transportation, and retail. (OK genius, where do they find these miracle model plans?) You can find the State’s model materials at, https://dol.ny.gov/ny-hero-act.

Another important point is that NY employers are not required to implement a plan in response to COVID-19. According to the Standards, they apply only to “an airborne infectious agent or disease designated by the Commissioner of Health as a highly contagious communicable disease that presents a serious risk of harm to the public health” and do not apply to “any employee within the coverage of a temporary or permanent standard adopted by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration setting forth applicable standards regarding COVID-19 and/or airborne infectious agents and diseases.”

With that in mind, all NY employers are required to:

  • adopt an industry-specific Model Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plan published by the NYSDOL – or create and implement a company-specific plan that meets or exceeds the State’s minimum requirements – no later than August 6, 2021;
  • provide a copy of the final plan to all workers – including all full- and part-time employees, independent contractors, staffing agency employees, and domestic workers – in writing within 30 days from the date the plan is implemented (or September 4, 2021, at the latest), and, going forward, immediately when new workers join the company, and to all workers and bargaining (union) representatives upon request;
  • post a copy of the company’s plan in each workplace and in a prominent location accessible to all workers;
  • include a copy of the company’s plan in the employee handbook; and
  • in the event of a future closure due to an airborne infectious disease, a written copy of the plan must again be provided in writing to all workers listed above – this time within 15 days after reopening. 

Employers with remote workers are not required to adopt an Airborne Infectious Disease Exposure Prevention Plan for telecommuting or telework sites (such as employees’ homes) unless the employer can exercise control over the site.

Finally (yes, finally!), the State’s standards indicate that employers should review and update their plans as necessary to reflect new or modified tasks and procedures related to occupational exposure and to reflect new or revised worker assignments. Regularly reviewing and updating the company’s plan will help ensure you’re able to “promptly activate the worksite exposure prevention plan” in the event an airborne infectious disease emergency is declared.

At this point, I’m guessing you have a few acronyms in mind to describe your feelings about this latest mandate, and HERO isn’t one of them!


 
If you enjoyed Frankly Speaking, let me know! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact me at frank@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-416-0751.
 
Stay well… 

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2021 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

Frankly Speaking – NYS DOL Cancels All Employer Unemployment Insurance Charges…Indefinitely!

Standard

Here’s an announcement that came from left field (baseball! pitchers and catchers report to spring training in a few days…sorry, that’s not the announcement). On January 14, 2021, New York State Department of Labor (“DOL”) Commissioner Roberta Reardon signed an Order that temporarily cancels unemployment insurance (“UI”) charges for all employers. 

According to the Order, retroactive to March 9, 2020, and going forward for an indefinite period, the State will use the general unemployment insurance account to cover all unemployment benefit payments. Also, regardless of whether the employer pays unemployment insurance taxes or directly reimburses the State for UI benefits paid to claimants, the Order cancels all charges made against employers’ accounts from March 9, 2020. (Did somebody in Albany get a printing press from Santa? Never mind, I don’t want to know.)

Under the federal Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”), self-insured nonprofits, Native American tribes, and government agencies were to be reimbursed 50 percent of their unemployment charges from March 13, 2020, through December 31, 2020. Based on the Commissioner’s January 14, 2021 Order, the State will reimburse these employers the remaining 50 percent charged to their accounts during that period. Further, charges incurred beginning January 1, 2021, will be charged to the State’s general account¾not the employer¾indefinitely.   

The NYS DOL has not indicated how it will reimburse eligible employers for UI charges incurred on or after March 9, 2020. However, the most likely scenario is a credit against future unemployment insurance benefit charges. 

This Order also means the continuing flood of unemployment claims since March 9, 2020, will have no negative impact on private employers’ UI experience ratings. What we don’t know is whether these employers will be required to continue paying unemployment insurance taxes.

Employers should continue reviewing DOL charge statements, bills, and other documents on a timely basis and continue to protest claims as appropriate. Also, there has been an exponential increase in fraudulent UI claims. (Yep, I recently got a notice that I filed for UI benefits!) Employers who receive UI benefit notices for potentially fraudulent benefit claims should notify the NYS DOL at 888-598-2077, at https://webapps.labor.ny.gov/dews/ui/fraud/report-fraud.shtm, or by mail at NYS Department of Labor, Office of Special Investigations, Bldg. 12-Room 200, W.A. Harriman Campus, Albany, NY 12240.   


 
If you enjoyed Frankly Speaking, let me know! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact me at frank@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-416-0751.
 
Stay well… 

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2021 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

Frankly Speaking – NYS Issues Guidance on COVID-19 Quarantine Paid Leave

Standard

Since being enacted on March 18, 2020, New York State (“NYS”) COVID-19 quarantine paid leave has been a constant source of confusion and consternation for many employers. Although the state’s Department of Labor (“DOL”) has issued some employer guidance, including guidance specific to the healthcare industry, many of the most problematic questions have gone unanswered.

As a review, NYS law requires employers to provide up to 14 days of paid sick leave (depending on employer size, net income, and whether it is a private or public employer) for employees subject to a mandatory or precautionary order of quarantine or isolation (a “COVID-19 Order”) issued by an authorized governmental entity. [Didn’t that expire at the end of 2020.] Unlike the federal Families First Coronavirus Response Act (“FFCRA”) paid leave mandate which expired on December 31, 2020 (extended as a voluntary program), the NYS COVID-19 quarantine paid leave mandate is ongoing.

Some of the more vexing questions have related to whether employees subject to COVID-19 Orders on multiple occasions are eligible for multiple periods of COVID-19 quarantine paid leave. For example, Stefon was subject to a 14-day COVID-19 Order in June 2020 because a household member was diagnosed with COVID-19. Stefon works for a large employer of more than 500 employees, so FFCRA paid leave was not available. Stefon’s employer was required to provide paid leave under the NYS COVID-19 quarantine paid leave law. On January 5, 2021, after testing positive for COVID-19, Stefon was placed under a 14-day COVID-19 Order.   Continue reading

Frankly Speaking – January 23, 2021

Standard

Surprise!

Who doesn’t love a surprise? Well, other than my spouse, Becky. Especially when I say, “I’ve got a surprise for you!” and she needs to wait to get whatever it is.
 
Governor Cuomo and the state’s department of labor (“DOL”) have a surprise for many New Yorkers. As part of his executive budget proposal, the Governor calls for the DOL to significantly change how partial unemployment insurance (“UI”) benefits are calculated for individuals who work during a benefit week. But claimants won’t need to wait because the Governor instructed the DOL to immediately implement “emergency measures” regarding the new rule. [But if it’s in the Governor’s budget proposal, and the legislature hasn’t passed the budget, how can the new rule be implemented immediately?] Because the Governor said so, that’s all you need to know! 
 
Historically, under NY law, UI benefits have been reduced by 25 percent for each day any work was performed. For example, Blake and Terry are neighbors, and both are unemployed. They were both hired by a small business, each working eight hours and earning less than $504 weekly. Blake worked all eight hours in one day, while Terry worked two hours, four days per week. Based on the number of days worked and weekly earnings, Blake’s weekly benefits were reduced 25 percent, and Terry’s were reduced 100 percent. That’s right, although they both worked the same number of hours, Terry was ineligible to receive any weekly UI benefits.
 
First, the good news, after decades of a statutory calculation that was, at best, a disincentive to working part-time during a job search, NYS made a change. Effective January 18, 2021, NYS implemented an “hours-based” calculation for partial weekly UI benefits. Also, as was the case under the previous rule, if a claimant’s gross earnings are more than $504 during a benefit week, they are not eligible for UI benefits that week regardless of the number of hours worked.
 
Now the not-so-good news. The new “hours-worked” approach is more complicated than the old “days-worked” system. Why? Because, once again, NYS is not in any way even remotely prepared for this change. From the guidance provided to date, it appears no modifications have been made to the state’s reporting system to allow claimants to report the number of hours worked. Instead, claimants must first convert hours-worked to days-worked, then report the number of days based on the state’s new calculations. SURPRISE! 
 
It’s astounding that NYS would implement a significant overhaul to the UI reporting process – a process already replete with issues and errors – and expect claimants to essentially calculate their own partial benefits, using what is basically a series of if/then statements, without the assistance of any online tools.
 
Below is the basic process as I understand it: 
 
Step 1: If the claimant’s gross earnings are more than $504, they are ineligible for UI benefits that week. If gross earnings for the week are $504 or less, continue to the next step.
 
Step 2: To determine the number of days-worked and whether the week’s benefits will be reduced, the claimant must convert the number of hours they worked during the week to days-worked, based on the following chart:
  • 0 to 4 hours worked – report 0 days worked to UI – no reduction in weekly benefits.
  • 5 to 10 hours worked – report 1 day worked to UI – benefits reduced by 25 percent.
  • 11 to 20 hours worked – report 2 days worked to UI – benefits reduced by 50 percent.
  • 21 to 30 hours worked – report 3 days worked to UI – benefits reduced by 75 percent.
  • 31+ hours worked – report 4 days worked to UI – benefits reduced by 100 percent.
Notes:
  1. If the total hours worked for the week includes a partial hour, the claimant should round up to the next whole hour. For example, if a claimant worked a total of four hours and 15 minutes during the week, they must round up to five hours and report one day worked. 
  2. If a claimant works more than 10 hours in a single workday, they should count only the first 10 hours. For example, claimant A worked two 12-hour shifts for a total of 24 hours. So claimant A counts only 10 hours of each shift, a total of 20 hours, and reports two days worked. However, although claimant B also worked 24 hours, they worked 6-hour shifts on four separate days. Therefore, claimant B must report three days worked.
Step 3: The claimant reports the total days-worked they calculated to NYS UI. (Claimants who choose the alternative of walking away muttering curse words under their breath should not expect to receive UI benefits that week.)
 
Employees working part-time and collecting partial UI benefits may turn to their employers with questions on the new calculation and reporting process. Employers and claimants can find information on the new partial benefits process at: dol.ny.gov/unemployment/partial-unemployment-eligibility.
 
Finally, employers participating in the state’s Shared Work program should be aware that, according to the NYS DOL, Shared Work is a separate program with its own rules, which are not affected by recent changes to the partial UI benefits process described above.
 
Confused? I’m not surprised.

 
If you enjoyed Frankly Speaking, let me know! Also, feel free to share it with friends and colleagues. 
 
Employment-related questions or issues? Does your employee handbook need to be updated? Contact me at frank@hrcexperts.com, or call 585-416-0751.
 
Stay well… 

Posted by Frank Cania, president of HR Compliance Experts LLC.

© 2021 HR Compliance Experts LLC

Disclaimer: This content is for informational purposes only, does not constitute a legal opinion, and is not legal advice. The facts of each situation should be considered and analyzed individually. Therefore, you should always consult with competent employment counsel regarding any issues discussed here.


CLICK HERE to learn more about Frank Cania and HR Compliance Experts LLC.

Fridays with Frank – Sept 27, 2019

Standard

Happy Friday!

September has been a whirlwind! First, with the October 9th deadline quickly approaching, I’ve conducted countless Sexual Harassment Prevention presentations (NY employers, remember the October 9th deadline!). Then, in addition to I-9 Palooza!, I spent three days at the NY State SHRM Annual Conference in Albany, where I had the pleasure to present on both the US Supreme Court and legislative advocacy for HR professionals.

But, the world doesn’t slow down because I’m busy. So let’s catch up together with another exciting edition of Fridays with Frank Continue reading

Fridays with Frank – Sept 20, 2019

Standard

Happy Friday!

Wow, what a great week. I spent three days in Cleveland, OH, at a conference aptly named I-9 Palooza! That’s right. Three days filled with all things I-9 and E-Verify!

Although nothing could match the excitement of I-9 Palooza, this week’s Fridays with Frank is still pretty cool.

Did You Just Call Me A Dummy?  No! However, LawLogix (the company behind I-9 Palooza!) published a great paperback and e-book called Form I-9 & E-Verify for dummies. Not as extensive as the 122-page USCIS Form I-9 Handbook for Employers (M-274), it’s an excellent resource for employers and HR professionals to understand the Form-I-9 and E-Verify process and requirements better. Continue reading

Fridays with Frank – Sept 13, 2019

Standard

Happy Friday the 13th!

If you’re like me, you can’t help laughing when you walk into an elevator and notice there’s no button for the 13th floor. (Spoiler Alert! Pressing 14 actually takes you to the 13th floor in those buildings!) I’m also probably tempting fate by admitting I think black cats are beautiful and I have no problem stepping on cracks in the sidewalk.

This week’s Fridays with Frank is guaranteed to be the best one yet. I was wearing my lucky socks when I wrote it!  Continue reading

Fridays with Frank – Sept 6, 2019

Standard

Happy Friday!

Why is it that short work weeks always seem to feel longer than a standard workweek? Especially when the short week is preceded by a vacation. Maybe it’s because I’m trying to get two weeks’ worth of work done in four days!

But, don’t worry, Fridays with Frank is a priority. So, let’s get to it!

She said, “Hi,” he heard, “Hello there, you sexy thing!”  Wow, no easing into potential conflict for me this week! In, Sexual Overperception Bias and Workplace Harassment, Jeffrey Polsky, an attorney with Fox Rothschild, discusses the role male sexual over-perception bias (yep, that’s a new one for me too!) may play in some forms of workplace harassment. Is this another lame attempt at excusing certain unacceptable behaviors? Continue reading

Fridays with Frank – Aug 30, 2019

Standard

Happy Friday!

As my time away with family winds down, I’ve been thinking about the importance of staying connected.  Not just with the family and friends I call or text daily, but with other friends I truly value.  So, I’ve been making a conscious effort to reach out to one or two of those special people each day, and it’s been fantastic.  Over the Labor Day weekend, I challenge you to call or send a quick text to someone you value but don’t connect with often enough.  I guarantee it will make you both happy.

As a special Labor Day treat, I’ve selected reading materials that pair well with a cup of coffee, a glass of wine, or your favorite adult beverage–mine is pictured above!  So, grab a drink, relax, and enjoy your long weekend! Continue reading